Originally posted by DED
PHIL BLOOM
NUDE ON TV SHOCKED CALVINIST HOLLAND
Source: ANP (Walter Paap 1967)
Holland's smallest TV and broadcasting organisation VPRO this week shocked Dutch television-viewers when it presented a completely nude girl in
it's controversial teenage-show 'Hoepla'. The girl, 21-years-old photographic model Phil Bloom, some weeks ago caused a storm of
comment and indignation when she appeared completely nude in the first instalment of the 'Hoepla-show'. However, on that occasion she had
been shown through a veil. This time nothing was left to the imagination of the viewers and Phil appeared stark naked before the eye of the camera
(....) VPRO-manager Mr. van Houte indicated in an interview that his organisation – after the stormy reception of the first instalment of its
'Hoepla' show - had decided to proceed with the show because it did not want to give in to what he described as an organised
newspapercampaign againt VPRO's programme policy. He said: 'The nude girl in the 'Hoepla' show was decent'. At no time did
she behave suggestively or erotically, but she had remained completely motionless. Mr. van Houte said the girl did not appeal to lower sexual
instincts but only showed the beauty of the nude female body. He said: ' A nude girl can be beautiful, this is what we wanted to show and that is
what we did' ! (....) The "nude on TV' has posed several questions: Will the number of nude appearances increase? And what is the
attitude of the law? For the law says that indecent exposure is an offence, punishable by imprenment not exceeding a period of two years and a fine
not exceeding 300 guilders. Are Phil Bloom and the VPRO guilty of indecent exposure? Dutch television viewers are convinced that they will be in for
another shock, but when and how are still under wraps. But so far Phil and her employers seem to have booked a victory.....


|